2025(4):185-192.
DOI: 10.4103/ohbl.ohbl_7_25
Abstract:
Objective: To develop mosquito trap prototypes and compare theirefficiency and cost-effectiveness with commercial products. Methods: The frameworks for mosquito trap prototypes wereseparately developed and assembled. The warmth retentionefficiency and duration of carbon dioxide (up to 400 ppm) releasewere determined for the prototypes. Mosquito trap efficiency wasdetermined by comparing the number of mosquitoes trapped in stickyglue only, mosquito trap prototypes I, II, and III, and commercialproducts I, II. A comparative analysis of cost, durability, availability,power consumption and effectiveness was also performed. Resultsare expressed as mean±standard deviation. A P<0.05 was consideredstatistically significant. Results: Mosquito trap prototypes I, II and III were successfullydeveloped. The warmth retention and carbon dioxide release (up to400 ppm) were sustained for about two hours after the assembly ofthe prototypes. Mosquito trap experiments demonstrated significantlyhigher mosquito trap efficiency for mosquito trap prototype III, with6.3±3.1 mosquito trapped using citric acid:sodium bicarbonate (1:2)and 4.6±2.1 mosquito trapped using citric acid:sodium bicarbonate(1:1). No mosquitoes were trapped in both commercial mosquitotraps. Furthermore, commercial mosquito traps were expensive, haduncertain durability, longer access times after ordering, and requireda continuous power supply. In contrast, the developed mosquito trapprototype III was cheap, easy to handle, durable, easily available,required low power consumption and highly effective in trappingmosquitoes. Conclusions: Mosquito trap prototype III provides an economicaland viable solution for trapping mosquitoes, mainly for low-incomepopulations.